|
|
本帖最後由 evertonarteta10 於 2017-8-18 11:16 編輯
KLAASSEN真係唔好預佢比好多KEY PASS或者直接助攻, 反而佢係進攻端做番D修正, 一腳彈個波比隊友, 簡單又直接呢瓣岩佢, 呢幾場佢真係唔係咩PLAYMAKER料, 一D拉空位, 入攝, 做輸送就岩哂佢.
佢真係唔係PLAYMAKER料, 係一個識用波傳波又跑上跑落又肯入攝禁區既中場中
http://www.ajaxdaily.com/2016/the-davy-klaassen-conundrum/
呢稿野講左佢點解唔係PLAYMAKER, 佢最多只係GOALSCORING AM. 有興趣可以禁入去睇下, 我節錄少少:
As a 10, he added goals and assists but was criticized for not being the instinctively creative force that Eriksen was which seemed an unfair comparison. However, Klaassen as a 10 seemed to thrive when the rhythm and pace of the game suited him and allowed him the space and the opportunity to create and score but he seemed to struggle against the more well-organized defenses.
Klaassen’s future would probably lie as a box-to-box midfielder or a goalscoring attacking midfielder. His movement in between the midfield and final third is why the late great Johan Cruyff believed he should have gone to the 2014 World Cup in Brazil
His one-touch passing style could prove pivotal in moving the ball quickly out of the deeper areas while at times last season when he was playing much higher up the pitch, he often chose to pass when he could’ve taken the opportunity to turn and take a chance on in a crucial position in the final third.
His ability to pass and move in between the channels in the final third can not be understated but getting more involved all over the pitch should be Klaassen’s primary focus.
所以點解仲要買施格臣, 就係咁解
|
|
發表於 2017-8-18 10:40:33
2-0 主場算係一個可以接受的結果
發表於 2017-8-18 11:12:37
